Social Lottery or Numerical Sociology ~ Pairing of Human Character and Evolution

Written on March 11, 2001 (1 WE).

• This came to me while analyzing the pairing frequency in a lotto 6/69 game. The frequencies show undeniable inequalities. Not all pairs have the same effect within a range of drawings. I made an analogy with the society. Not all individuals have the same impact on change. The determining factor is the pairing with a mixture of good qualities and bad qualities.

I won't define now the good qualities and the bad qualities. There is a lot of common ground in defining human qualities. Regardless of geography, ideology, religion, etc. we can define a common axiological group of human qualities. The point I want to make here is that the individuals paired with good qualities do have an impact on social change in the positive direction. The individuals who pair with bad qualities have significantly less effect in bringing about positive change. The former push humanity to the Moon; the latter have fought to keep humans in the caves (not as in Plato's Republic, but more as in The Bible).

Here are some significant numbers concerning pairings.

Number: 1 Hits: 19 ( 9.5 %)
With #: 8 16 30 22 25 14 31 32 42 27 29 17 21 15 33 ... 61 62 2 64 65 6 69 24 59 60 38 11 46 34 55 66 67 19 20
Hits: 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pairs total: 95

* Number: 2 Hits: 23 ( 11.5 %)
* With #: 36 40 6 48 68 24 25 7 9 42 11 50 61 64 66 ... 8 26 52 15 56 28 30 31 32 63 34 16 17 18 39 1 4 37 3 62 33 53 46 55 29 57 14
* Hits: 6 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Pairs total: 115

* Number: 69 Hits: 18 ( 9 %)
* With #: 19 51 63 3 22 26 36 40 6 9 64 29 34 18 8 43 47 .... 50 20 21 55 56 57 10 60 62 23 24 65 11 67 68 41 28 35 7 58 30 46 61 17 48 49 32 33 52 53
* Hits: 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Pairs total: 90

• The top 10% of the individuals paired with good qualities has a 25% effect on social change.
• The bottom 10% of the individuals (at the other end of the spectrum: those paired with bad qualities) makes no contribution to human evolution. Despite their aggressive and noisy behavior, they are as passive as inert parasites. They perceive creation as an act of…destruction! Destruction is the religion of the lowest 10-percenters.

• The top 25% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 50% of social progress. The opposite 25% (bottom) group just contributes 5% of the unstoppable social change.
• The top 50% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 75% of social progress. The opposite 50% (bottom) group just contributes 25% of the unstoppable social change.
• The top 75% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 95% of social progress. This is the good news. The vast majority in any human society always is headed in the right direction and makes a significant contribution to human progress.

  Read more meaningful facts:

• Ion Saliu: Book of Records in History, Discoveries, Achievements, Truth.

Follow-up:
• Numerical sociology and Aristotle's theory of correspondence.

• Ion Saliu's Book of Records.

• Computational Psychology, Philosophy: Fear-Survival, Human Life.
• Essential Resources In Philosophy - The Main Philosophical Hub.

• Almighty Number, Randomness, Universe, God, Order, History, Repetition.
• Mathematics of the Fundamental Formula of Gambling.
  • The mathematical proof of the inexistence of God or the absurdity of the God concept.
• There are no perfect shapes or geometrical forms on Earth to justify a super intelligent, divine force in the Universe; only humans create perfect shapes in an attempt to have some control over randomness.
• Zeno's Paradox of Achilles, Tortoise
  • The first philosophical, logical, and mathematical solutions to the aporiae (paradoxes) of Zeno of Elea.

• Truth, Beliefs, Religion, Science, Philosophy, Mental Programming, Brain Washing.
• Intelligent Design or Cruel Designer – Theory of Evolution Versus Creationism.
• Brain waves, mind, communication, body language, behavior.
• Brain, Seizures, Beliefs, Religious Behavior.

• Download Software: Science, Mathematics, Statistics, Lexicographic, Combinatorial.

Comments:
: : Social lottery, numerical sociology, human qualities. I made an analogy with the society. Not all individuals have the same impact on change. The determining factor is the pairing with a mixture of good qualities and bad qualities. I won't define now the good qualities and the bad qualities. There is a lot of common ground in defining human qualities. Regardless of geography, ideology, religion, etc. we can define a common axiological group of human qualities. The point I want to make here is that the individuals paired with good qualities do have an impact on social change. The individuals who pair with bad qualities have significantly less effect in bringing about change. The “top 10%” of the individuals paired with good qualities has a 25% effect on social change. : The bottom 10% of the individuals (at the other end of the spectrum: those paired with bad qualities) makes no contribution to human evolution. Despite their aggressive and noisy behavior, they are as passive as inert parasites. They perceive creation as an act of…destruction! Destruction is the religion of the lowest 10 percent of humans. The top 25% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 50% of social progress. The opposite 25% group just contributes 5% of the unstoppable social change. The top 50% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 75% of social progress. The opposite 50% group just contributes 25% of the unstoppable social change. The top 75% of the group with good qualities can contribute as much as 95% of social progress. This is the good news. The vast majority in any human society always is headed in the right direction and makes a significant contribution to human progress. Ion Saliu is the fastest human in history to apply the normal probability rule (bell curve) to numerical sociology. Each human faces, in a lifetime, a split-nation of vicious haters and embarrassing adulators. Of all individuals a human subject interacts with, 99.7% fall within three standard deviations of agreement-disagreement with said human. One half of the 0.3% of the two extremities is represented by vicious haters; the other half is represented by libidinous adulators. Each and every human being faces hostility in his or her lifetime — about the same amount as adulation. I call it the law of social lottery or numeric sociology. An old member of the communities I founded (forums and the like) brought to my attention that Aristotle had a similar discovery a couple of millennia ago in the field of numeric sociology. One thousand individuals of interaction provide a small team of three haters/adulators. One million individuals of interaction lead to a small town of 3000. One billion individuals of interaction build a small nation of 3,000,000 - half of them vicious haters, the other half unbearable adulators. Title: Social lottery, numerical sociology, humans, society, human qualities. The Everything is ruled by Almighty Randomness; everything follows the theory of probability, including social life, society, civilization. On Aristotle, sociology, individual, personal, human, quality, qualities, axiological, numerical, numeric, geography. Read about ideology, religion, random, randomness, pairs, pairing, pairings, formula, probability. Get free software, lottery, mathematics, theory of probability, system, statistics, numbers, number, social, progress, change, frequency, creation, destruction.

Home | Search | New Writings | Software | Odds, Generator | Contents | Forums | Sitemap