Lotto Wonder-grid best options

Posted by Ion Saliu on July 28, 2001.

In article qYx87.13970$Gi.41195608@newsserver.ip.pt, Franc Jose says...

Ion,

As I understood you cheched for lotto winners with the draws that has made the pairs and your 49 lines wheel , isn't it?

The best way to check for winners it would be:

1- to divide your lottery in two parts; let's think your lottery is UK; you select the 250 draw to divide UK lotto in two parts. With the first 250 first draws you make your wheel by your method ( five most frequent pairs); 2- Now that you have a wheel with 49 lines you check for winners next 250 lottery draws and see what you would win if you played this wheel in UK lotto after the 250th draw.

If your method is really a good one , any player playing by it would win more than the odds. Really I'd like to know which results you get with this test. I know your lotto software is free and I can do by myself but you are expert on it and I have no practice with it.

Only one problem with your method: if many lottery players adopt it they will be concurrent because they are playing the same lotto wheels and the jackpot will be divided or the second prize.

Frank

• The best results so far have been within a range equal to 'N/2 = the biggest number divided by 2' (25 for a lotto 49/6 lotto game). You have a DATA-6 (exactly 6 lotto numbers per line, real drawings). You can delete a number of N/2 lines. Save the file under a new name: DATA-6.2. Run the frequency report (F in UTIL-6) for DATA-6.2.
Create a 'best pairing' file WHEEL6.2. You can check now WHEEL6.2 against DATA-6 for N/2 drawings. Or, you can do the frequency report with the current DATA-6.
Use the resulting BEST6 file for the next N/2 lottery drawings.

There are plenty of options.
1) You can do a frequency report after every drawing and use BEST6 for the next lotto drawing only.
2) You can do the frequency report starting at different positions in the 'most frequent pairings'. By default, the program starts at position 1: 'the best lotto pairing'. You can start with the 3rd most frequent pair, or the 4th best pair, etc. The middle ranks will join the elite. The probability is significantly lower that the bottom will skyrocket to the top…

By the way, this lottery strategy came to life after I received a critical point from a person who wants to be known as “Johnny G of Florida”. The 'lotto wonder-strategy' has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Z, or Mr. T, or Mr. Misterfield. As you know, many claim to be heroes… after the war!

Ion Saliu

Resources in Lottery Software, Lotto Wheeling

• Download lottery software, lotto software.

  Follow Ups:
  

• Wonder Grid Lottery Strategy Plays Pairs of Lotto Numbers Ion Saliu 3/24/2001.
• Optimal lotto drawings range to analyze for lottery wonder grid system Ion Saliu 4/07/2001.
• The optimal lottery drawings range to analyze - Illinois Lotto Bill Smith 4/09/2001.
• BELLOTTO, BELLBET, BETUS: Software to generate random combinations for lotto, lottery, gambling Ion Saliu 4/09/2001.
• The Wonder-grid lottery strategy hit the lotto jackpot in Belgium Lottery El Loco 3/29/2001.
• Lottery Pairs System, Lotto Pair Strategy lottoscorp 3/28/2001.
• Likely winning lotto numbers to wheel by best lotto wheels software KM 3/27/2001.
• Lottery system: Lotto numbers, skips of lotto numbers, sum of gaps BigJer 3/28/2001.
• Lotto deltas in powerful, winning lottery software KM 3/29/2001.
• Lottery Analysis in the Spirit of Ramanujan – The Great Indian Mathematician Ramanujan 3/25/2001.

Comments:
: : Wonder grid: best lotto strategy system software. I know your lotto software is free and I can do by myself but you are expert on it and I have no practice with it. Only one problem with your method: if many players adopt it they will be concurrent because they are playing the same lotto wheels and the jackpot will be divided or the second prize. The 'lottery wonder-strategy' has absolutely nothing to do with Mr. Z, or Mr. T, or Mr. Misterfield. I need to answer one more question regarding the 'lotto magical grid'. When is it best to do the pairing report? Do it starting at the most recent draw and use the BEST6 lotto file from that point on for a number of (future) drawings? Yes, that's an option. But you can also go back a number of drawings in the data file and work with those reports and "wheel" files. You have a DATA-6 (exactly 6 lotto numbers per line, real drawings). You can delete a number of N/2 (the biggest lotto number divided by 2) lines. Save the file under a new name: DATA-6.2. Run the frequency report (F in UTIL-6). Create a 'best pairing' file WHEEL6.2. Open DATA-6 again and now delete the top N drawings. Save the file as DATA-6.N. Repeat the step above; save 'best pairings' as WHEEL6.N. You can check now all WHEEL6 files against DATA-6 and/or against future drawings. One of them will yield the best results. In any event, the 'wonder-grid' yields far better results than any other wheel, even 3-4 times larger. "Thank you Ion for the new UTIL-6. It's a little ironic that you send it to me now. I just created a file (before checking my e-mail) using all of the lotto balls in the Illinois lottery, and pairing each one up with the 5 numbers that hit the most with each ball. I then checked it for winners, and had similar results to yours. LotWon does not cover PowerBall to the same extent as lotto-6. Powerball was of no interest to me, because it's not offered by PA lottery. You may try to use powerball-6 the same way as lotto-6. Treat the powerpall as the 6th lotto number. You can see what results UTIL-6 gives you. In most cases, the powerball is not equal to any of the 5 regular numbers. What is the best way to report the pair frequency? Pair the five regular lotto numbers only? Or throw the powerball in the mix as well? The formula is also validated by real lottery drawings. I haven't heard of any report to the contrary, in any lottery. I am convinced now FFG will not be contradicted in this regard, ever.<Br> : Let's take the lotto 6/49 game, the most common worldwide. The median is 6 (use my freeware FORMULA to do the calculations for a 50% degree of certainty). We need software to plot the skips for each lotto number. A skip shows how many drawings a number waits between hits. My freeware "MDIEditor and Lotto" and UTIL-6 do the best job at charting the lotto skips. The second part of the lottery strategy is newer in my research. It is based on the pairings of the lotto numbers. Given a range of drawings, each lotto number shows a clear bias towards being drawn with the rest of the lotto numbers. The newest version of my freeware UTIL-6 calculates the frequencies of all lotto pairings for every lotto number. The 25% segment of the most frequent pairs account for 50% of the entire pairing frequency for any given lotto number. : The "top 50%" of the lottery pairings represents 75% of total frequencies for each number. That is, the first half of the pairs (from left to right) accounts for 75% of the entire pairing frequency for any given lotto number. : Again, I repeat the very important point here. My analysis of the lotto pairings is not as thorough as other domains of my gambling mathematics. But this is an open debate and we should be able to find the fault, if it exists. So, I assume that the pairing percentages above hold true for any lotto game, at any given point in a lotto history. : Curiously, this strategy does NOT work with static lotto wheels. Instead of playing all possible combinations of 5, we may think of wheeling the 12 most frequent pairs. Let's say the best '3 of 5' 12-number static wheel amounts to 6 combinations. 24 x 6 = 144 combinations, while the 3rd prize is lower than $144. Even playing a 4-combination '3 of 5' wheel makes no sense at all. 24 x 4 = 96, probably still below the prize! One more reason why playing static lotto wheels is a no-no. See also my post on this message board: "The myths of lottery: frequency and systems". : There is another category. There are those who don't want to make their "killer' strategies public. I have received several requests to take a look at or try to improve lottery or gambling systems.