Perfect Record for My Horse Racing Software at Belmont Stakes 2001

• The results at Belmont Stakes 2001:

9 Point Given
8 A P Valentine
5 Monarchos

The winning trifecta 9-8-5 was predicted straight by LotWon (combination #2). Also, the winning horse (#9) was predicted twice. The payouts were disappointing, however. $47 for the two win tickets, plus $38 for the $1 trifecta. A total of $85 in winnings, against $64 in total cost. As I said in the previous message (812.html):
"That’s the drawback of horse-racing. You have to go through long streaks of meager winnings until long-shot trifectas hit."

I can see two approaches to playing the horse races:

1) The casino approach;
2) The lottery tactic.

1) In the casino approach, you aim at the winners. As in casino gambling, the probability is fairly high, as opposed to the much lower probability in lottery. Higher probability means shorter losing streaks. The player will track the losing streaks for higher probability bets, such as the favorite to win, or frequent exactas/trifectas to win. The player will bet larger amounts on such plays when the streaks are optimal.

2) In the lottery tactic, you aim at long shots: individual horses, or exacta/trifecta combinations. As in lottery, the probability is lower but the payout is much higher. The losing streaks are clearly longer. The player will place fairly low bets on highly paying plays. They horse racing winnings are far less frequent, and the player should be aware of that. The bets can pay really big, sometimes.

LotWon can be successfully used with both approaches. The horse racing software requires up-to-date results. I posted previously that the Triple Crown races need to make available the results by post position as well. The respective websites publish less meaningful data, such as the clouds or lack thereof. The post position is, sometimes, a more decisive factor than a horse’s qualities. A super horse like Point Given lost the Kentucky Derby because of his post position (#19). The horses don’t have minds, but they have great vision. It is one thing for a horse to see 18 double-creatures at the first turn. It probably is a more positive sight to notice only 8 double-creatures in front…

The Preakness webmaster promised me he would make available the post positions of past Preakness Stakes races. If such data is not available, I’ll use from now on the current results of the racetrack. I treat a Triple Crown as just another race at the track. Any data is better than no data.

I remember how I applied for the first time my pick-3 method to horse racing. I think it was the Sportsman’s track. I had tracked two previous races at Sportsman’s. I was watching also the track on the TV set at the left, and the races at the track covered by the TV on the right side of the Sportsman’s TV. So I had 6 winning horse racing trifectas on a piece of paper. I didn’t want to play any of the previous numbers in the same positions. I only was careful not to play really long shots in position 1 (to win). I came up with few combinations, one of them being the straight winning trifecta: 6-1-3. I also played #6 to win.

I remember also the reaction of disappointment from two players next to me at the bar. One of them expressed his newly found philosophy to his partner: "The horses have no minds! They don’t read the program; they don’t care about the odds! They are just numbers!" The horseracing LotWon was born that night...

Ion Saliu

• More proof of randomness? How about the killer payouts at the Kentucky Derby 2005? TV Sports, Ratings, Drama, Tragedy, Even at Kentucky Derby 2005.

Resources in Horse Racing: Mathematics, Software, Betting Systems, Wagering, Trifectas

• Updates to the Bright lotto, lottery, and horse racing software applications.
  Updates to several Bright software packages: pick-3 and pick-4 lotteries, horse racing, 5- and 6-number lotto games.

• Win at horse racing as pick-3, pick 4, digit lottery with the best betting systems and software.
• Kentucky Derby Results, Past Horse Numbers Ranked by Wins.
• Preakness Stakes
• Results, Statistical Analyses by Horse Numbers at Belmont Stakes.

• BRIGHTH3: High-Power Horse Racing Trifecta Software.
• PICKH32: Integrated Horse-racing Trifectas Software.
• Better ways to play, bet, wager at horse racing.
• LOGIC Horse Betting Free System.
• Useful Horseracing Information.

• Download Horse-racing Software.

Comments:
: Perfect record, results at Belmont Stakes for LotWon Software. The results at Belmont Stakes 2001: 9 Point Given 8 A P Valentine 5 Monarchos. The winning trifecta 9-8-5 was predicted straight by LotWon (combination #2). Also, the winning horse (#9) was predicted twice. The payouts were disappointing, however. $47 for the two win tickets, plus $38 for the $1 trifecta. A total of $85 in winnings, against $64 in total cost. As I said in the previous message: “That’s the drawback of horseracing. You have to go through long streaks of meager winnings until long-shot trifectas hit…” I can see two approaches to playing the horse races: the casino gambling approach; the lottery tactic. In the casino approach, you aim at the winners. As in casino gambling, the probability is fairly high, as opposed to the much lower probability in lottery. Higher probability means shorter losing streaks. The player will track the losing streaks for higher probability bets, such as the favorite to win, or frequent exactas/trifectas to win. The player will bet larger amounts on such plays when the streaks are optimal. In the lottery tactic, you aim at long shots: individual horses, or exacta, trifecta combinations. As in lottery, the probability is lower but the payout is much higher. The losing streaks are clearly longer. The player will place fairly low bets on highly paying plays. They winnings are far less frequent, and the player should be aware of that. The bets can pay really big, sometimes. LotWon can be successfully used with both approaches. The software requires up-to-date results. I posted previously that the Triple Crown races need to make available the results by post position as well. The respective websites publish less meaningful data, such as the clouds or lack thereof. The post position is, sometimes, a more decisive factor than a horse’s qualities. A super horse like Point Given lost the Kentucky Derby because of his post position (#19). The horses don’t have minds, but they have great vision. It is one thing for a horse to see 18 double-creatures at the first turn. The Preakness webmaster promised me he would make available the post positions of past Preakness Stakes races. If such data is not available, I’ll use from now on the current results of the racetrack. I treat a Triple Crown as just another race at the track. Any data is better than no data. I remember how I applied for the first time my pick-3 method to horse racing. I think it was the Sportsman’s track. I had tracked two previous races at Sportsman’s. I was watching also the track on the TV set at the left, and the races at the track covered by the TV on the right side of the Sportsman’s TV. So I had 6 winning trifectas on a piece of paper. I didn’t want to play any of the previous numbers in the same positions. I only was careful not to play really long shots in position 1 (to win). I came up with few combinations, one of them being the straight winning trifecta: 6-1-3. I also played #6 to win. I remember also the reaction of disappointment from two players next to me at the bar. One of them expressed his newly found philosophy to his partner: “The horses have no minds! They don’t read the program; they don’t care about the odds! They are just numbers! • I don’t want to be accused of disrespecting the horses. In reality, the horses are my favorite species, second to humans only. The horses played a great role in human history. This time, I’ll name the horses, even if I use numbers to play horseracing! Here is the field at Belmont Stakes 2001. I used HORSES with two types of inner filters: favorites and long-shot exclusions. I wanted at least one of the five favorites: 1, 3, 5, 8, 9. I did not want a combination of two of the three long shots 2, 6, 7. Such restrictions are probably validated in more than 90% of the races. Total possible combinations (trifectas) with the restrictions: 390. Of course, one can play all 390 combinations and have a high probability to win. Problem is, if the favorites are among the top three finishers the winning trifecta pays less than total cost! There are situations when the trifecta pays very well. But one should know what the streak is, as far as long-shot trifectas are concerned. In such rare cases, the restrictions will be reversed. I would want combinations of two long shots as favorites. Meanwhile, I would want to exclude all combinations of two favorites. I’ll proceed with my picks for Belmont Stakes 2001. I loaded the file in the editor and navigated to the line 270. I don’t see winnings close to those at the Kentucky Derby. That’s the drawback of horseracing. You have to go through long streaks of meager winnings until long-shot trifectas win. Title: Perfect record results at Belmont Stakes for Ion Saliu's Horse-racing Software. The perfect results: Win at horse races as pick-3 lottery: trifecta, exacta, win. The best winning strategy with proven mathematical winning strategies, the best gambling software. Studies of horse races, horseracing, horses, trifecta, superfecta, exacta, top three finishers, top 4 finishers. Get software, theory of probability, gambling formula, method, probability, guaranteed, skip, skips. Find out about repeat, repeats, track, tracks, bet, betting, bettors, exactas, trifectas, superfectas, race, straight, boxed, wager, wagers, numbers, names, post positions, Triple Crown, record, Belmont, Belmont Stakes, Kentucky Derby. Win horse races, horse-racing, horse racing, winning software.